This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to sourcing problems in the "Adaptaions" section. Many statements are uncited, and there are some unreliable sources used. Is anyone willing to address this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Removed the unsourced Russian claim, cited the video game. The rest of the material seems to be reliably sourced: none of the sources are redlisted. I've reorganised the material slightly and removed the most trivial stuff. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ref 71 (to cracked.com) should probably be replaced, and other mediums expanded if able, but unsourced statements are resolved. Z1720 (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]